eeemojieeemoji
โ†๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜–โ†’

Face Screaming In Fear Emoji

Smileys & EmotionU+1F631:scream:
epicfacefearfearfulmunchscaredscreamscreamerscreamingshockedsurprisedwoah

About Face Screaming In Fear ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

Face Screaming In Fear () is part of the Smileys & Emotion group in Unicode. Added in Unicode E0.6. Type on GitHub and Slack to use it. On TikTok, type in comments to insert it. Click copy above to grab it, paste it anywhere.

Works in iMessage, WhatsApp, Discord, Slack, Instagram, Twitter, Gmail, and every app that supports Unicode.

Often associated with epic, face, fear, and 9 more keywords.

Meaning varies across cultures, see cultural notes below.

Scroll down for the full story: meaning, trends, combos, and more.

All Smileys & Emotion emojisCheat SheetKeyboard ShortcutsSlack GuideDiscord GuideDeveloper ToolsCompare Emoji Tools

How it looks

What does it mean?

A yellow face with wide white eyes, a gaping mouth, hands pressed against its cheeks, and a pale blue forehead. The pose references Edvard Munch's *The Scream* (1893), making this one of the few emoji explicitly modeled after a specific artwork.

Despite being named "Face Screaming in Fear," ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is almost never used for actual fear. Emojipedia describes it as conveying "shock or horror, often used in a lighthearted way," and that "lighthearted" qualifier does the heavy lifting. In practice, this is the surprise emoji. The "OMG" face. The "I can't believe what I just read" reaction. When someone texts you shocking gossip, you don't reach for ๐Ÿ˜จ (fearful face). You reach for the one that looks like you're grabbing your own face, which is dramatic enough to be funny.


The disconnect between name and usage is wide. Dictionary.com notes it's used for "extremes of emotion: both negative and positive ones that would elicit screaming, whether horrified or excited." A screaming fan and a screaming victim make the same face. ๐Ÿ˜ฑ captures both. "I got the promotion ๐Ÿ˜ฑ" and "they broke up ๐Ÿ˜ฑ" use the exact same emoji because the emotion isn't fear, it's the physical jolt of surprise. Ranked around 71st globally in emoji frequency, and reportedly declining in France and Germany.

In texting, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is the go-to reaction for shocking news, both good and bad. "I got the job ๐Ÿ˜ฑ" and "they broke up ๐Ÿ˜ฑ" use the same emoji because the emotion isn't fear. It's the physical jolt of surprise, the sharp intake of breath, the hands-on-face moment where your brain hasn't caught up to what your eyes just saw.

On social media, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ thrives in reaction contexts. It's the emoji under a plot twist, a celebrity reveal, a price tag, an unexpected before-and-after. TikTok has its own hidden scream emoji (a blue face with wide eyes and hands on cheeks) that you access by typing in comments. The "Italian Brainrot" trend in 2025 paired ๐Ÿ˜ฑ with AI-distorted faces in operatic overreactions, pulling over 1.2 billion TikTok views.


Despite being categorized as a "negative" face emoji, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ leans positive in actual usage. People reach for it when they're excited, not just when they're scared. A surprise party gets ๐Ÿ˜ฑ. A surprise bill also gets ๐Ÿ˜ฑ. The emotion is the jolt, not the valence.


The generational pattern is less pronounced for ๐Ÿ˜ฑ than for other faces. All age groups understand and use it similarly, because surprise is universal. The one exception: Gen Z may use it more for ironic overreaction ("they changed the font on the app ๐Ÿ˜ฑ") while older users reserve it for things that actually surprise them.

Shock or disbeliefDramatic surprise (positive or negative)"OMG" reactionScary or horror contentUnexpected reveals or plot twists
What does the ๐Ÿ˜ฑ emoji mean?

Shock, surprise, or disbelief. Despite being named "Face Screaming in Fear," it's rarely used for actual fear. It's the "OMG" face, the hands-on-cheeks reaction to genuinely surprising news. Its design references Edvard Munch's 1893 painting The Scream.

Why is ๐Ÿ˜ฑ used for surprise when it's called 'screaming in fear'?

The hands-on-face, mouth-open pose reads as theatrical shock rather than genuine terror. It's too dramatic to feel truly scary, which makes it perfect for lighthearted 'OMG' moments. The name-vs-usage gap is one of the widest in the emoji standard.

Is ๐Ÿ˜ฑ actually used for fear?

Rarely. Despite the name, about 90% of usage is for surprise, shock, or excited disbelief rather than genuine fear. The Munch-level drama of the emoji makes it feel more theatrical than frightening, which is why people use it for gossip and plot twists rather than actual scary situations.

Name vs. Reality: How Researchers Classify ๐Ÿ˜ฑ vs. How People Use It

Academic sentiment analysis classifies ๐Ÿ˜ฑ in the "strong negative sentiment" cluster: low valence (2.74/9), high arousal (6.91/9), alongside angry and fearful expressions. But actual usage tells a completely different story. When researchers at PLOS ONE analyzed real social media posts, the emoji fragments across multiple emotional states, and the majority aren't negative at all. The gap between the official label ("Face Screaming in Fear") and real-world usage (mostly excited surprise) is one of the widest in the emoji standard.

What it means from...

๐Ÿ’›From a crush

From a crush, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is almost always positive surprise. "Wait you like that band too?? ๐Ÿ˜ฑ" is excited disbelief. "You did WHAT ๐Ÿ˜ฑ" could be shocked in a good or bad way, read the rest of the message. The hands-on-face pose is dramatic by nature, so even negative shock from a crush is usually softened by the theatricality of the emoji.

โš ๏ธFrom a partner

In a relationship, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is reactive. They saw something, heard something, or read something that genuinely surprised them. It's a request for engagement: they want you to ask "what happened??" If a partner sends ๐Ÿ˜ฑ and you don't follow up, you've failed the conversational prompt.

๐Ÿ˜‚From a friend

Among friends, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is the gossip emoji. "You won't BELIEVE what just happened ๐Ÿ˜ฑ" is the opening move of a story. Multiple ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜ฑ means the story is going to be good. It's the group chat equivalent of running into the room and grabbing someone by the shoulders.

๐ŸซขFrom family

From family, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is usually literal surprise. Parents send it for unexpected news (good or bad). "Your sister is engaged ๐Ÿ˜ฑ" is genuine shock from someone who doesn't use emoji ironically.

๐Ÿ’ผFrom a coworker

At work, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is acceptable in casual channels for reacting to genuinely surprising news (a big client, an unexpected announcement). It's one of the few expressive face emojis that doesn't read as unprofessional, because surprise is a neutral emotion.

๐Ÿ˜ถFrom a stranger

From a stranger online, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is a reaction to your content. It means they found something you posted shocking or impressive. It's almost always a compliment in this context.

โšกHow to respond
If someone sends ๐Ÿ˜ฑ, they want you to ask what happened. The scream face is a conversational hook. "Wait what??" or "TELL ME" keeps the energy going. Don't leave a ๐Ÿ˜ฑ on read. That's like watching someone scream and just walking past them.
What does ๐Ÿ˜ฑ mean from a guy?

Usually genuine surprise or excited shock. If he's reacting to your news with ๐Ÿ˜ฑ, he's impressed or can't believe it. In a dating context, it's almost always positive: he's engaged with what you told him and wants to hear more.

What does ๐Ÿ˜ฑ mean from a girl?

Same meaning: shock or disbelief. Girls often use ๐Ÿ˜ฑ as a gossip prompt ("you won't believe this ๐Ÿ˜ฑ") or as an emphatic reaction to surprising information. It's rarely negative in female-to-female texting.

Fear-Family Fingerprint: How ๐Ÿ˜ฑ Diverges From Its Siblings

The shock-and-fear cluster looks tight on a keyboard but spreads wide on a radar. ๐Ÿ˜ฑ owns comedic shock and hyperbolic surprise; ๐Ÿ˜จ still carries genuine fear; ๐Ÿ˜ฐ dominates the workplace-friendly anxiety register; ๐Ÿคฏ took the reaction-image / mind-blown lane that ๐Ÿ˜ฑ used to handle alone before Emoji 11.0 (2018) shipped its successor. The empty quadrant is the story: no single fear emoji is genuinely scary AND workplace-acceptable, which is why people fall back on words for actual emergencies.

Emoji combos

Origin story

The design references Edvard Munch's *The Scream* (1893), one of the few emoji explicitly based on a specific artwork. The hands-on-cheeks pose, the gaping mouth, and the pale blue forehead (where color has drained away) all reproduce Munch's composition. Unicode approved it as in 2010, and every major platform renders it as an obvious homage.

One detail worth knowing: the figure in Munch's painting isn't actually screaming. Munch's 1892 diary describes sensing "an infinite scream passing through nature." The figure is covering its ears, not yelling. The painting's original title, Der Schrei der Natur ("The Scream of Nature"), makes the source of the scream clearer. The shortened title changed how everyone reads the image, and the emoji inherited that misreading.


Munch created four versions of The Scream between 1893 and 1910: two paintings and two pastels. The painting has been stolen twice. The first theft happened on the opening day of the 1994 Winter Olympics in Lillehammer: burglars climbed a ladder, broke a window at the National Gallery in Oslo, grabbed the painting in 50 seconds, and left a note reading "Thanks for the poor security." It was recovered three months later in a sting operation. In 2004, armed men ripped another version off the wall of the Munch Museum in broad daylight; it took two years to recover. A third version, a 1895 pastel, sold at Sotheby's in 2012 for $119.9 million, a record at the time. The buyer was later revealed to be Leon Black, the Apollo Global Management chairman.


That misreading of the painting turned out to be useful. Because people see the figure as screaming in shock, the emoji landed naturally in surprise contexts rather than anxiety ones. The pose reads as "grabbing your own face in disbelief," which is exactly how people use it: reacting to surprising news, shocking plot twists, or gossip that makes you gasp. And then there's the pop culture feedback loop: Andy Warhol's 1984 screenprint series repackaged the image as mass-produced pop art, the Scream film franchise (1996-) turned the face into a slasher icon, and Kevin McCallister's aftershave scene in Home Alone (1990) cemented the hands-on-cheeks pose as a universal gesture of dramatic shock. By the time the emoji arrived in 2010, the pose had been so thoroughly recycled through movies, memes, and merchandise that it needed no explanation. Munch painted existential dread. The internet turned it into the OMG face.

Approved in Unicode 6.0 (October 2010) as FACE SCREAMING IN FEAR. Added to Emoji 1.0 in June 2015. Part of the Emoticons block (-). Does not support skin tone modifiers.

The design direction was clear from the start: hands on cheeks, wide open mouth, pallid forehead. Every major platform (Apple, Google, Samsung, Meta) renders it as an explicit reference to Munch's painting. The pale blue gradient at the top of the face, absent from most other yellow emoji, specifically evokes the painting's suggestion that the color has drained from the figure's skin. It's one of the few emoji that's a direct, intentional reference to a specific artwork.

The Scream by the Numbers: Munch's Painting in Hard Facts

The painting behind the emoji has a wild biography of its own. Munch created four versions between 1893 and 1910. Two have been stolen and recovered. One sold for $119.9 million at Sotheby's in 2012, a world record at the time. The image has been reproduced so many times across film, merchandise, and pop art that it became one of the most recognizable compositions in Western visual culture long before it became an emoji.

The Painter Vandalized His Own Painting

For more than a century, art historians argued over a tiny pencil sentence in the upper-left of The Scream's 1893 version: "Kan kun vรฆre malet af en gal Mand" ("Can only have been painted by a madman"). Most assumed a vandal scrawled it. In February 2021, curator Mai Britt Guleng of the National Museum of Norway ran infrared scans, compared the handwriting to Munch's diaries and letters, and confirmed it was Munch's own. Conservator Thierry Ford and research librarian Lasse Jacobsen co-led the analysis. The inscription was likely added in 1895, after Munch attended a Christiania Students' Society meeting where a young medical student called Johan Scharffenberg argued the painter must be mentally ill to have produced such work. There's a documented family history of mental illness on Munch's side, and Guleng described the inscription as "a combination of being ironic, but also showing his vulnerability". The most reproduced face in art history carries a hand-written rebuttal from its own author, hidden in plain sight, settled only after 126 years.

Design history

  1. 1893Edvard Munch paints the first version of The Scream, the artwork the emoji would later referenceโ†—
  2. 1984Andy Warhol creates a screenprint series of The Scream, cementing the image as pop art iconographyโ†—
  3. 1990Home Alone's Kevin McCallister aftershave scene echoes the hands-on-cheeks Munch pose, spreading the gesture into mainstream pop cultureโ†—
  4. 1994The Scream stolen from Norway's National Gallery on the opening day of the Lillehammer Olympics; recovered three months later in a sting operationโ†—
  5. 1996Wes Craven's Scream film debuts, featuring a Ghostface mask directly inspired by Munch's paintingโ†—
  6. 2004A second version of The Scream stolen at gunpoint from the Munch Museum in Oslo; recovered two years laterโ†—
  7. 2010Unicode 6.0 approves ๐Ÿ˜ฑ as U+1F631 FACE SCREAMING IN FEARโ†—
  8. 2012Munch's 1895 pastel of The Scream sells at Sotheby's for $119.9 million, a world auction record at the timeโ†—
  9. 2015Added to Emoji 1.0 for cross-platform standardizationโ†—

Around the world

The Munch connection makes ๐Ÿ˜ฑ unusually Western in its visual reference, but shock and surprise are universal emotions. The hands-on-cheeks gesture is readable across cultures.

In Japan, surprise in digital communication is expressed through kaomoji that emphasize the eyes and mouth: or . The physical gesture of hands-on-cheeks isn't as culturally embedded in Japanese expression of surprise, so the Munch reference may read more as "foreign art" than as an instinctive pose.


In Western internet culture, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ has become detached from fear almost entirely. Dictionary.com notes it conveys "both negative and positive" extremes of emotion. The shift from fear to general surprise happened gradually as users found it more useful for "OMG" moments than for actual horror.


Emoji usage data suggests ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is "endangered" in France and Germany, meaning its popularity is declining in those markets relative to other shock/surprise emojis. This may reflect cultural preferences for less theatrical expressions of surprise.

Is the ๐Ÿ˜ฑ emoji based on a painting?

Yes. It's a direct reference to Edvard Munch's The Scream (1893). The hands on cheeks, gaping mouth, and pale forehead all reproduce the painting's composition. Every major platform renders it as an explicit homage to Munch's work.

Viral moments

2025TikTok
"Italian Brainrot" trend pairs ๐Ÿ˜ฑ with AI-distorted faces
The "Italian Brainrot" TikTok trend used ๐Ÿ˜ฑ alongside AI-distorted pasta faces in operatic overreactions, pulling over 1.2 billion views. The emoji's exaggerated shock became the reaction layer on top of already surreal content, turning ๐Ÿ˜ฑ into a meme format rather than just a reaction.

Popularity ranking

Among the shock and fear family, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ leads by a wide margin because it does double duty as both fear and surprise. ๐Ÿ˜จ Fearful Face is more specific to anxiety and reads as less dramatic. ๐Ÿ˜ฐ Anxious Face adds sweat for worried anticipation. ๐Ÿ˜ฑ's hands-on-cheeks Munch pose makes it the most visually distinctive, which helps it dominate the category.

Who uses it?

Despite being named "Face Screaming in Fear," the emoji is overwhelmingly used for surprise rather than actual fear. Only about 1 in 10 uses express anything close to real horror. The rest range from excited shock to ironic overreaction, with "OMG gossip" being the single largest use case.

Often confused with

๐Ÿ˜จ Fearful Face

๐Ÿ˜จ (Fearful Face) has wide eyes and a frown but no hands on the face and no open mouth scream. It conveys quiet, internal fear rather than dramatic shock. ๐Ÿ˜ฑ screams outward. ๐Ÿ˜จ worries inward.

๐Ÿ˜ฐ Anxious Face With Sweat

๐Ÿ˜ฐ (Anxious Face with Sweat) adds a sweat drop to worried eyes. It's about anticipatory anxiety, not reactive shock. You use ๐Ÿ˜ฐ before something bad happens and ๐Ÿ˜ฑ after it does.

๐Ÿ˜ฎ Face With Open Mouth

๐Ÿ˜ฎ (Face with Open Mouth) is milder surprise: raised eyebrows, small "oh" mouth, no hands. ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is the amplified version. ๐Ÿ˜ฎ is "oh, interesting." ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is "OH MY GOD."

What's the difference between ๐Ÿ˜ฑ and ๐Ÿ˜จ?

๐Ÿ˜ฑ is dramatic, outward shock (hands on face, mouth open, referencing The Scream). ๐Ÿ˜จ is quiet, internal fear (wide eyes, small frown, no scream). ๐Ÿ˜ฑ reacts to what just happened. ๐Ÿ˜จ worries about what might happen.

Do's and don'ts

DO
  • โœ“Use it for genuinely surprising news, both good and bad
  • โœ“Stack multiples (๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜ฑ) when the surprise warrants escalation
  • โœ“Use it as a gossip prompt ("you won't believe this ๐Ÿ˜ฑ")
  • โœ“Pair it with ๐Ÿ‘ป for Halloween and horror content
  • โœ“It's one of the few expressive emojis acceptable in casual workplace Slack
DONโ€™T
  • โœ—Don't use it for minor surprises. The Munch-level drama needs proportional content
  • โœ—Don't overuse it, or every message starts to feel like a tabloid headline
  • โœ—Don't use it for genuine emergencies where you need someone to take you seriously
Can I use ๐Ÿ˜ฑ at work?

Yes, cautiously. ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is one of the few expressive face emojis that's acceptable in casual professional settings, because surprise is a neutral emotion. Reacting to big company news with ๐Ÿ˜ฑ in Slack is fine. Using it repeatedly or for trivial things looks dramatic.

Is ๐Ÿ˜ฑ appropriate for Halloween content?

Yes, it's a natural fit. The Munch-inspired design, pale forehead, and scream pose all read as spooky. Pair it with ๐Ÿ‘ป, ๐ŸŽƒ, or ๐Ÿ”ช for Halloween captions. It works better than ๐Ÿ˜จ (which reads as anxious) because ๐Ÿ˜ฑ's theatricality matches Halloween's campy energy.

Caption ideas

Aesthetic sets

Type it as text

๐Ÿค”It's named "fear" but used for surprise
Despite being officially called "Face Screaming in Fear," about 90% of actual usage is for surprise, shock, or excited disbelief rather than genuine fear. The dramatic hands-on-face pose reads as theatrical rather than terrified, which is why people use it for gossip and plot twists rather than actual scary situations.
๐ŸŽฒThe painting connection most people miss
The emoji references Munch's *The Scream* (1893), but the figure in the painting is actually *hearing* a scream, not producing one. Munch described sensing "an infinite scream passing through nature." The emoji inherited the popular misreading, which accidentally made it work perfectly as a surprise reaction.
โšกOne of the few emoji that isn't fully yellow
The pale blue gradient at the top of ๐Ÿ˜ฑ's forehead breaks the solid-yellow-face convention. It suggests color draining from the skin, a detail carried over from Munch's painting. This makes ๐Ÿ˜ฑ visually distinct from other face emoji even at small sizes, and it's partly why it reads as more extreme than ๐Ÿ˜จ (fearful face), which stays fully yellow.

Fun facts

  • โ€ขThe figure in Munch's painting isn't actually screaming, it's hearing a scream from nature. The original title was Der Schrei der Natur ("The Scream of Nature"). The emoji inherited the misreading, which accidentally made it perfect for surprise contexts rather than anxiety ones.
  • โ€ข๐Ÿ˜ฑ ranks around 71st globally in emoji frequency. It's reportedly "endangered" in France and Germany, meaning its popularity is declining in those markets. The French and Germans, apparently, have less need for theatrical shock.
  • โ€ขThe "Italian Brainrot" TikTok trend of 2025 paired ๐Ÿ˜ฑ with AI-distorted pasta faces in operatic overreactions, pulling over 1.2 billion views. The emoji's exaggerated shock became the reaction layer on top of already surreal content.
  • โ€ข๐Ÿ˜ฑ is one of the few emoji that breaks the solid-yellow-face convention. The pale blue gradient at the top of the forehead, absent from most other face emojis, specifically suggests that color has drained from the skin. It's a design choice that makes ๐Ÿ˜ฑ visually distinct even at small sizes.
  • โ€ขThe *Scream* film franchise (1996)) and the hands-on-cheeks scene in *Home Alone* (1990) both echo the same Munch pose. The gesture is so embedded in pop culture that the emoji reads instantly without anyone needing to know the art history.
  • โ€ขThe painting behind the emoji has been stolen twice. The first theft (1994) happened during the Lillehammer Olympics opening ceremony, and the burglars left a note saying "Thanks for the poor security." The second (2004) was an armed daylight robbery at the Munch Museum. Both versions were recovered.
  • โ€ขAcademic researchers classify ๐Ÿ˜ฑ in the "strong negative sentiment" cluster (low valence, high arousal), but when the same researchers look at how people actually use it, the dominant sentiment is positive surprise. It's one of the most misclassified emojis in sentiment analysis systems.
  • โ€ขMunch created four versions of The Scream between 1893 and 1910. The 1895 pastel sold for $119.9 million at Sotheby's in 2012, making it the most expensive artwork ever sold at auction at that time. The buyer, later revealed to be billionaire Leon Black, was bidding by phone.

Common misinterpretations

  • โ€ขThe biggest irony: an emoji named "Face Screaming in Fear" is almost never used for actual fear. Most users deploy it for surprise or shock. Using it in a genuinely scary situation may read as dramatic rather than distressed.
  • โ€ขIn some cultures, the hands-on-cheeks Munch pose isn't an instinctive shock gesture. Japanese digital culture uses kaomoji with emphasis on eye width for surprise rather than hand placement. The Western art reference may not translate everywhere.
  • โ€ขOveruse drains ๐Ÿ˜ฑ of its impact. If every message includes a scream face, nothing feels surprising anymore. Save it for moments that genuinely warrant the Munch treatment.

In pop culture

  • โ€ขEdvard Munch's *The Scream* (1893) is the direct visual source. The emoji reproduces the hands-on-cheeks, open-mouth composition. Munch created four versions; two have been stolen and recovered, and one sold for $119.9 million at Sotheby's in 2012.
  • โ€ขAndy Warhol's 1984 screenprint series repackaged The Scream as brightly colored pop art, stripping away the existential dread and treating the image as a mass-produced consumer product. The British Museum notes Warhol put The Scream on the same level as Mickey Mouse or a can of Campbell's soup. This is arguably the moment the painting's composition became a visual shorthand rather than a fine art reference, paving the road to emoji.
  • โ€ขKevin McCallister's hands-on-cheeks scream in *Home Alone* (1990) predates the Scream franchise and echoes the same Munch pose. The aftershave scene became one of the most parodied moments in film history, and the pose is now inseparable from both the painting and the emoji.
  • โ€ขThe *Scream* mask from the *Scream* film franchise (1996-)) was designed by Fun World and directly inspired by Munch's painting. The mask's elongated mouth and hollow eyes translate the painting into a wearable horror prop. The franchise has grossed over $900 million worldwide.
  • โ€ขThe composition has shown up in *The Simpsons*, on inflatable Halloween yard decorations, on phone cases, and as TikTok filters. Each reuse reinforces the same feedback loop: the more the pose circulates, the more instantly readable the emoji becomes.

Ghostface Predates Scream by Five Years

The lineage from painting to emoji runs through one specific Halloween mask, and that mask wasn't designed for the movies. The Ghostface design that Wes Craven used in Scream (1996) was a Fun World "Fantastic Faces" Halloween mask called "The Peanut-Eyed Ghost"), produced from 1991. Fun World vice-president Allan Geller approved the final mold; the design was adapted from a "wailer" prototype made by Alterian Inc. artist Loren Gitthens in 1990-1991. The mask sat on retail shelves for half a decade before producer Marianne Maddalena spotted one inside a house during a 1996 location scout, brought it to Craven, and he immediately said "This is like the famous Scream painting." KNB Effects (Greg Nicotero, Howard Berger) tried to design a custom replacement; Craven rejected it and Dimension Films licensed the original. The painting fed the mask, the mask fed the franchise, the franchise fed Halloween retail back, and the emoji that arrived in 2010 was a derivative of a derivative of a derivative.
  • ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ
    1893: Munch paints The Scream: Berlin studio, after the Christiania sunset experience he later wrote about in his diary.
  • ๐Ÿ‘ป
    1990-1991: Loren Gitthens prototypes a wailer ghost mask: At Alterian Inc., the design that becomes Fun World's mold.
  • ๐ŸŽญ
    1991: Fun World ships "The Peanut-Eyed Ghost": Sold for years as a generic Halloween mask, no movie attached.
  • ๐Ÿ“
    1996: Marianne Maddalena spots one on a location scout: Brings it to Wes Craven; Dimension Films licenses the design.
  • ๐ŸŽฌ
    1996: Scream is released: Ghostface becomes the most-sold Halloween costume in the United States.
  • ๐Ÿ“ฑ
    2010: Unicode 6.0 ships ๐Ÿ˜ฑ: Apple, Google, and Samsung all render it as the Munch pose, not the Ghostface mask.

Trivia

What painting inspired the ๐Ÿ˜ฑ emoji design?
What is ๐Ÿ˜ฑ most commonly used for?
What makes ๐Ÿ˜ฑ visually unique among face emoji?
Where is ๐Ÿ˜ฑ reportedly declining in popularity?
What is the figure in Munch's painting actually doing?

For developers

  • โ€ขCodepoint: . Part of the Emoticons block (-). No variation selector needed.
  • โ€ขShortcodes: on Slack, GitHub, and Discord.
  • โ€ขDoes not support skin tone modifiers (no ZWJ sequences).
  • โ€ขThe pale blue gradient at the top of the face is a distinctive rendering choice. If building custom emoji displays, note that this emoji breaks the solid-yellow-face convention.
  • โ€ขIn sentiment analysis, ๐Ÿ˜ฑ is ambiguous. Despite being categorized as negative (fear), actual usage skews heavily toward neutral-to-positive surprise. Weight accordingly.
๐Ÿ’กAccessibility
Screen readers announce this as "face screaming in fear." The label is technically the Unicode name but doesn't reflect how most people use the emoji (for surprise rather than fear). The art history connection to Munch is not conveyed through assistive technology.
When was ๐Ÿ˜ฑ created?

Approved in Unicode 6.0 in October 2010, added to Emoji 1.0 in June 2015. The painting it references, The Scream, was created by Edvard Munch in 1893. So there's a 117-year gap between the artwork and its emoji adaptation.

See the full Emoji Developer Tools guide for regex patterns, encoding helpers, and more.

How do you use ๐Ÿ˜ฑ?

Select all that apply

Related Emojis

๐Ÿ˜ฏHushed Face๐Ÿ˜จFearful Face๐Ÿ˜ฎFace With Open Mouth๐Ÿ˜œWinking Face With Tongue๐ŸซขFace With Open Eyes And Hand Over Mouth๐ŸซฃFace With Peeking Eye๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซFace With Spiral Eyes๐Ÿ˜ŸWorried Face

More Smileys & Emotion

๐ŸฅนFace Holding Back Tears๐Ÿ˜ฆFrowning Face With Open Mouth๐Ÿ˜งAnguished Face๐Ÿ˜จFearful Face๐Ÿ˜ฐAnxious Face With Sweat๐Ÿ˜ฅSad But Relieved Face๐Ÿ˜ขCrying Face๐Ÿ˜ญLoudly Crying Face๐Ÿ˜–Confounded Face๐Ÿ˜ฃPersevering Face๐Ÿ˜žDisappointed Face๐Ÿ˜“Downcast Face With Sweat๐Ÿ˜ฉWeary Face๐Ÿ˜ซTired Face๐ŸฅฑYawning Face

All Smileys & Emotion emojis โ†’

Share this emoji

2,000+ emojis deeply researched. One click to copy. No ads.

Open eeemoji โ†’